![]() ![]() If you are starting out, his method might be easier to understand. Telling that price action can never be wrong is BS. Marking trades after the fact it relatively easy. With Mack, I am not sure if he trades live. You need a a lot of patience and capital as I mentioned earlier. He calls out live entries and I have made money taking them. In my opinion, Al Brooks is the real deal. I really don't care if any one of them actually trades. Unless you are a very good scalper, you won't last long. ![]() The downside is that your edge is razor thin, partly because of the bad RR ratio. You get more entries per day than Brooks' approach. Mack's method can be called a subset Al's H2L2 entries and MTR variants (wait for a trend line break and wait for a HL or LH in opposite direction). I would say at least 50K if you want to implement proper position sizing with a 1% max risk per trade under all market conditions. ![]() You have to adapt yourself to the kind of day and volatility. There is a lot more to context in this approach. If you think it is just about H1 and H2 entries, you are dead in the water. Enormous degree of Patience, not just with learning, but also with implementing it live. In my experience, both Mack and Al Brooks methods will work if you put in the time and effort.Īl's work is hard to learn and understand. I have been largely dormant on this site and don't even have a journal here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |